[NetEpic ML] Re: one more time

From: Michele Heidal <gizmo_at_...>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:25:49 -0000

I think they should count for VPs after you fire them, for they leave the
table, this would explain the low cost of them. This way you just add a rule
not change the whole missile set up, less work for all.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos <pramos1_at_...>
To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 4:31 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: one more time

>Daniel Wiebell wrote:
>> Hi
>> I agree that a dice roll for availability for Deathstrikes is a VERY bad
>> idea. I think a better solution is to increase their points value. If a
>> titan warp missile is 100, then I think a Deathstrike battery of three
>> should be 350 at least, probably more. This is because they don't need
>> line of sight to shoot so it makes them a lot more dangerous than the
>> titan version.
>Point taken this is a better solution.
>> By the way did anyone answer the question of whether used (not
>> destroyed) Deathstrikes count for VPs?
>The missiles themselves DO NOT count towards the break point, but the
>launchers do.
>eGroups Spotlight:
>"Kosovo-Reports" - Direct reports from Kosovo/Serbia/Yugoslavia.
>eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
>Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com

eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Received on Wed Mar 31 1999 - 17:25:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:45 UTC