[NetEpic ML] Re: RSVP: Should NetEpic 4.0 Abstract More Units?

From: Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 17:22:01 -0700

Ignore the vote that had only two choices :) Tricky enter key...

Ken


> Should NetEpic 4.0 abstract more units to remove redundancy (moving the
detailed entries to the Optional rules)?
> E.G. ONE type of dreadnought (not seven!), one type of Falcon (for both
models), etc etc.
> ----
>
> Please select one of the following:
>
> o Yes, abstract as much as possible
> o Yes, but not to the extent of E40K
>
>
> by going to the following Web form:
>
> http://www.egroups.com/vote?id=925345016411
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tired of waiting for your stock quotes and charts to load?
> StockMaster is super-fast for quotes, charts, news, and portfolios.
> Markets don't wait, why should you? http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/69
>
> eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/group/netepic
> http://www.eGroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/group/netepic
http://www.eGroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Received on Thu Apr 29 1999 - 00:22:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:45 UTC