RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:17:11 +0200

OK,

I was sertain they where a part of the Imperial Fists Chapter. Goes to show
one could be wrong. Anyhow, a Dark Angels Army is prohibbited to bring along
any other terminators except their own Death Wing Termies.

Nils

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: 25. juli 2001 09:08
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the
Emperor


Nope, Scythes of the Emperor were a whole chapter. After a nice little
meeting with hive fleet Kraken they were reduced to a mere company. They
hate tyranids and the card represents a special anti-tyranid strike force.
The unit was in a WD along with Kreuger's heroes and Blood Slaughterers
 

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
Sent: 25. July 2001 10:05
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor


Hi,
 
Dreadnoughts with an increased move 5cm is an interesting thought we've, as
Eivind said, tried this for quite some time. However, I think you'll seldom
field the dreadnoughts anyway. I have a hard time finding any real use for
them.
 
You got to remember that the Scytes of the Emperor is an Imperial Fists
unit! You shouldn't be able to field that if you ar playing with a Dark
Angles Army.
 
Nils
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Webb [mailto:Webbsoft_at_...]
Sent: 24. juli 2001 17:07
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor


Hi,
 
        Just finished playing a game for the EZine, during the battle I took
a detachment of Punisher Dreadnaughts to test them out having heard the
various complaints on the mailing list.
 
        The game only lasted 2 turns as unfortunatly we racked up the VP's
pretty quick, the Dreads were too slow to make any difference within that
time, however they would have probably been of more use in Turn 3. They
never got into range despite an attack on their flank, they might have been
in range had our devestator detachment not been so effective (in one fire
phase they wiped out a Land Raider detachment on their own).
 
        I think the Dreadnaughts move should be increased to 15cms, the
extra 5cms would have enabled us to have brought them into the conflict as
it was they were ineffective.
 
        The Ravenwing was deadly, I will definatly take it again in future
battles. I thought it odd though that its command unit was an infantry HQ
unit with a Rhino. Why not have an optional special card which can only be
used with the Ravenwing called the 'Master of the Ravenwing' basically a HQ
unit mounted on a bike or a land speeder. Give it a high CAF, morale bonus
within 10cms, replaces the normal HQ unit and cost an extra 50 points.
 
        My opponent was interested in fielding a unit known as the Scythes
of the Emperor, it is a special card with a thunderhawk and 5 terminator
stands. It costs 250 points, will there be a version in NetEpic. Personally
I think it's price should be raised, but I wouldn't object against playing
him with it.
 
        One rules question for you, when a detachment is loaded into a
Thunderhawk, what happens to the rhinos? Are they loaded to or are they left
behind and become exempt from squad co-herency? Just asking because our
opponent used a Thunderhawk with a detachment of Veterans onboard the Rhinos
were left behind and I felt it was odd.
 
Tom.

To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> of Service.




To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Jul 25 2001 - 07:17:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:24 UTC