Hi!
I'll do this. Then again there's no rush on the no army list since they are
unplaytested. We can dedicate ourselves to the "fluff" project which has
much support.
On another note anyone can recommend publishing software to generate a nice
layout for the full color net epic version? Are word and similar programs
enough?
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] DE and Tau drafts.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 01. November 2001 18:14
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] DE and Tau drafts.
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I will soon post how these lists looked at their last
> > discussion points. The
> > Tau seem to be cut and dry with few changes from the original.
> >
> > The DE present a problem, because their are two version with no clear
> > victor.
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to handle the DE draft?
> >
> > Also are their any volunteers to put these draft into doc or
> > PDF format?
> >
> > Let me know.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Maybe if the two versions of DE units could be posted separately as v1 and
> v2. Then we could make a poll about which version members prefer. BTW, if
we
> count the suggestions I made about certain unit stats we have three
> different versions.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 16:31:06 UTC