RE: [NetEpic ML] DE summary

From: Karlsen, Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:17:53 +0100

Yes, but i dont think such a weapon should exist. It's bad
enough that the Eldar get such a weapon, i don't think the
DE should have it as well..

Rune

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
> Sent: 12. november 2001 12:45
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] DE summary
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Karlsen, Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > Sent: 12. November 2001 13:40
> > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] DE summary
> >
> >
> > imho there should be no weapons which totally disregard the quality
> > of troops. The Shadow Spinner kills on a 4+. This applies no matter
> > what kind of save the troops have. This means that this weapon will
> > be more "cost effective" against more expensive troops. Any effect
> > which does not actually kill the troops, is ok, but as long as it
> > kills, it should take into account what kind of troops it kills.
> >
> > Rune
> >
>
> The shadow spinner is identical to the Eldar Doomweaver. The
> wording is
> exactly the same. Check the Eldar armylist.
>
> [snip]
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
> time and time is
> money.
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 12 2001 - 12:17:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:28 UTC