Bikes are vehicles? So SM bikes have no armor save if shooted from
side or rear... never thought of it. I've always considered bikes and
cavalry in general an infantry upgrade. By the way... cavalry like
bikes (vehicles) and Rough Riders (clearly not vehicles) have the
same rulings? One thing is the fire arc, 360° for the riders and 180°
for bikes?
Tnx in advance ^^
P.S.: ...and for the second question? (Flyer transports, below) :P
--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> T-hawks cannot carry units designated as "vehicles" so bikes would
be out.
> Dreadnoughts however are another story. Normally they would not be
allowed,
> but I have let this be done in my games since it does seem
practical and not
> over-powered.
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_t...>
> To: <netepic_at_y...>
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 4:13 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Flyer transports
>
> > Q2)
> > Flyers follow all the rules for transport vehicles? Bail out
saves,
> > combined movement between cargo and passengers... etc.
> >
> > Example: I have a T-hawk transporting 6 SM Tactical stands. If
the T-
> > hawk travels 50cm and deploy them, have each Infantry stand only
5cm
> > left of their movement? I cannot argue it from the rules, and in
our
> > club we treat transport flyers in a different manner, so the
> > passengers have their FULL movement when they disembark (the T-
hawk
> > is faster than a Rhino, so the passengers have more time to act
when
> > they arrive at destination).
> >
> > Tnx in advance! ^^
Received on Sun Nov 25 2001 - 10:25:11 UTC