Hi!
Well, the name of the thread derives from a member who pointed out that in Firepower issue 7 GW will mention a "new" epic edition called epic armaggedon. It seems they are adding more detail to the game and therefore some on the list (including myself) kinda think this is like re-inventing the whell, because SM/TL had already done this.
Of course the thread is accompanied by the usual tribute to GW's policies <evil grin>.
For those who want some more info on epic armaggedon go to:
http://www.games-workshop.com/40kuniverse/epic40k/el_epic40k.htm
They alledge the game design is "open" to feedback as its created....we shall see.....
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "george_sharp1" <geo-an-sue_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40,000 evolution
> Well for what it's worth, here's my opinion.
> I actually like the Epic 40k ruleset.
> I liked the sound of SM/TL, got hold of the rules book, started
> reading, got about 1/4 way through the first, then tossed it aside,
> far to complex. And i'd played 40K, Necromunda, etc quite a bit
> before. It is only now that I feel I can cope with SM/TL or Netepics
> complexity. The new rules ad a little 'grit' which is indeed nice,
> but I don't want it to get too complex, as it means we can still get
> a game of it in at our club, we never would with SM or Netepic, and
> yes we have tried :-)
> For me AT2 has had the exact opposite effect to what others described
> earlier. Her it's got pic being palyed agin. I could never get an
> opponent beofre, but since AT2 was released i've played about 5 games
> of that, about 4 epic games and 2 games using both sets of rules.
>
> But it is all a matter of opinion, and I do believe GW is a little
> full of itself, although Fanatic seem better. I haven't actually got
> the issue this threads about yet, but it ought to be a good read :-)
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 04 2002 - 00:45:53 UTC