Hi!
<grin> Yes, I know. I have a penchant for the complex......
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lorenzo Canapicchi" <lorenzo.canapicchi_at_txt.it>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Net Epic 5.0 ideas
> Completely agree with you, I'm not the one that have to remember to Peter
> the KIS rule :o)
> Anyway the point IMHO is that such kind of rules maybe could be very
> difficult when aaplied to some Army "style" composition.
>
>
>
> Christian Danckworth wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 1:11:01 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > in my opinion there is no need to restructure it like that...
> > i think, the 4.1 structure can be good enough to prevent player using only
> > the hardest troops without balance.
> > looks a bit 40k like - and is a bit a loss of the old-epic -feeling if
> > the changes would be made like that...
> > in 4.1 there are still restrictions - for example darkangels who
> > cannot use a veteran company, tech-guards who only can take knights,
> > etc.
> > what would make sense is a thought to develop which handles out the
> > problem of over abudance of "specialists" WITHIN the known structure -
> > otherwise its too complicated and changes the whole thing too much.
> > c-ya
> > christian
> > PR> Hi!
>
> --
> Lorenzo Canapicchi
> TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
> Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
> tel: 02.25771.460
> http://www.txt.it
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 26 2002 - 14:03:25 UTC