Re: [NetEpic ML] Brainstorm session

From: Zerloon <zerloon_at_...>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 22:26:05 +0100

At 08.22 26/03/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I thought I would throw out some ideas and comments that would be reviewed
>come revision time in order to get a feel for opinions:
>
>
>1. While I could go either way on the holofield for Eldar super heavies,
>it did bring up a more important issue regarding the super heavy damage
>tables. Do people like the very simple one or are you using the more
>detailed ones? Whats the preference?

Well I personally prefer the more detailed

>
>2. Praetorian costs are too low. This has been discussed before and after
>much playtest I agree that they need to be increased. The fact that they
>have templates make them as powerful as titans and sould be priced
>accordingly. For example, look at the Colossus, with its 8 battle cannon
>hitting on 4+ and shields. This thing is as good as most warlord titans! I
>tinkered with the points formula and would suggest that most praetorians
>need a price hike of 150 points on average. Comments?

boh?

>
>3. Another thorn is the issue of weapons with the same name having
>different stats for different units (bolters being the most prominent
>example). A lascannon should have the same stats regardless where its on
>as well as battle cannons, etc. Some uniformity here makes it easier for
>people to remember

Is only an estetic fashion... but is nice!!!

>
>4. AA guns should probably be defined as one of two types :static and
>mobile. Static AA are expensive, have long range and may only fire at
>either air or ground in a turn (not both). Mobile AA are cheap, shorter
>range and can fire at both ground and air units indescriminately.

Yes, but this meaning a complete changing of cost and stats i presume...
A lot of work, but a work that worth!!


Zerloon
Received on Tue Mar 26 2002 - 21:26:05 UTC