RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Basic building rules

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:13:45 -0400

Hi!

I see you point and agree, lets do this:

Basic- the rules you laid down with are basically the ones we have in
place with some clarifications

Advanced- The AT ones with the "extras" I submitted.

Is this acceptable to everyone?

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:08 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Basic building rules

I've been looking over the past few posts, and it seems that the idea of
partially damaged and unstable buildings is fairly popular. I agree. I
think we ought to get some rules together and put them into the
*optional*
section. Basic rules should be just that - basic. Hit points for
buildings,
partial collapse and instability rolls at the end of every turn is not
basic. Fun, yes, but not basic.
-Yar



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Apr 30 2002 - 12:13:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:37 UTC