Hi,
This would work fine for me :)
Rune
>
> Fra: "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/04/30 Tue PM 02:13:45 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Basic building rules
>
> Hi!
>
> I see you point and agree, lets do this:
>
> Basic- the rules you laid down with are basically the ones we have in
> place with some clarifications
>
> Advanced- The AT ones with the "extras" I submitted.
>
> Is this acceptable to everyone?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Basic building rules
>
> I've been looking over the past few posts, and it seems that the idea of
> partially damaged and unstable buildings is fairly popular. I agree. I
> think we ought to get some rules together and put them into the
> *optional*
> section. Basic rules should be just that - basic. Hit points for
> buildings,
> partial collapse and instability rolls at the end of every turn is not
> basic. Fun, yes, but not basic.
> -Yar
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 30 2002 - 12:14:45 UTC