Hi!
Perhaps, but it may be needless splitting. There are many "rationales"
one could apply. A SM dreadnought is bulky but slow so the vehicle could
escape by distancing itself. Of course then you could point out by that
rationale that a bike/cavalry should be able to pin the vehicle on
speed, but then I would point out you they don't have enough bulk.
Circular logic I guess.
One could surmise that it takes a combination of bulk and speed to pin.
So in reality infantry should be on their own. The next higher category
is dreads/robots/bikes and cavalry. Some in that category have more bulk
and speed other more speed than bulk, but eh AVERAGE, I think, is
similar. Vehicles have much more bulk to speed ratio than any bike,
cavalry or dreadnought, so they should be kept apart.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:43 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core rules Part II: summary
>Someone made a point about light walkers, but I guess we can lump them
>together:
>
>1. Titan/praetorians
>2. knights/super heavies
>3. Vehicles
>4. Walkers/cavalry/bikes
>5. Infantry/light artillery
>
Bunching them, together is easier, but I like the idea of
differentiating
between walkers. Maybe say that walkers with a CAF of 3+ or greater are
vehicles for pinning purposes ?
Weasel
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:
http://mobile.msn.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed May 01 2002 - 19:49:32 UTC