RE: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:34:06 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext antichrist666it [mailto:seimejote_at_tiscalinet.it]
> Sent: 07. May 2002 12:29
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > There where also some talk about Cyclone termies. Someone made
> stats for them. I dont remember who.
>
> Gimme the staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaats! :P
>
> Just substituting the storm bolters with the dread missile launcher?
> (50cm, 4BP, 5+, -1) cannot combine barrages of course
>

No barrages; the missiles are more like the normal missile launcher missiles. I'd give the launcher the same stats as devastator marine weapons with the excetion of better to-hit roll (4+) due to advanced guidance system.

> >
> > I also made the Crusader available to the termies as a detachment
> card. A termie detachment at the same cost, only switched the Land
> Raider with the Crusader. It would be a nice optional unit if people
> want it. It makes the Termies somewhat more flexible and not quite so
> useless as they are now.
>
> Disagree... why not make them standard transports for Termies of the
> Black Templars chapter? Outside Black Templars there are very few of
> them to justify even a detachment...
>

A single detachment would be OK. At present it's an update for the entire terminator company.

>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 09:34:06 UTC