>--- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > There where also some talk about Cyclone termies. Someone made
>stats for them. I dont remember who.
>
>Gimme the staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaats! :P
>
>Just substituting the storm bolters with the dread missile launcher?
>(50cm, 4BP, 5+, -1) cannot combine barrages of course
In fact, I would propably prefer to keep termies as close quarter troops. A
cyclone launcher is by no means powerfull enough to make a barrage template
with -1 to hit. The thing carry a load of 12 missiles only and is only
carried by ONE terminator per stand.
>Disagree... why not make them standard transports for Termies of the
>Black Templars chapter? Outside Black Templars there are very few of
>them to justify even a detachment...
Would work but I dont want to see chapters with advantages but no penalties.
Otherwise, why bother playing regular marines at all ?
And besides, in 40K (where the crusader is taken from) you can have a
crusader (allthough only 1) in a normal detachment. So chapters defiantely
have enough to field a detachment
Weasel
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 20:57:57 UTC