Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: Albert Farr� Benet <cibernyam_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:59:55 +0200

Agreed on the first and let's upgrade a bit the Ravenwing (as discussed in previous messages).

Agreed on the second. SM are defined by low numbers, versatility and movility. They AA vehicle should be a fast and versatile vehicle.

Albert
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Weasel Fierce
  To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] New Imperial units



> > Myself, I think that two units should be considered for addition.
> > 1) Marine bike company. I find it quite ridiculous that IG has
>these but marines don't. My suggestion of a marine bike company is 2
>detachments of bikes, one detachment of attack bikes and one bike
>stand HQ.
>
>1 - Imperial Guard should NOT have a Bike Company.
>2 - The only SM Chapters that should have a Bike Company are Dark
>Angels and White Scars, leave the others without.
>

  I would say that the Guard should have recon troops. No army can function
  without such, and I dont see a reason for a cavalry company but no bike one.

  As for marines, Your rule will just leave all bikes painted black or white.
  I'd say to let all marines buy bike companies


> > 2) Eivind's AA vehicle. Again it is strange that a mobile strike
>force should have stationary AA pieces while IG has mobile ones.
>
>Yep, it should be in.

  Definately



  Weasel

  _________________________________________________________________
  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 21:59:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:38 UTC