Hi!
I'm not making any comment on the HQ's fighting ability, it may very
well be characterized as elite, but for game balance they can't have the
accumulated powers of HQ and elite, that too much. Even when the fight
besides them they are still in command and that supercedes anything
else. Each has its own advantage and they must live with it.
The only unit I can remember is Harlequinns and I could see them as
elite units, but there's not much of a conflict there, since their own
ability is better than what any elite status gives them. A simple
clarification for this one unit will suffice.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: rune.karlsen6_at_... [mailto:rune.karlsen6@...]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:25 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls
Id say that any commanders which actually fight alongside
the troops are elite. If they're pencil pushers, thats another
thing entirely. After all, id hesitate about putting my life
in the hands of a commander which wasnt experienced with fighting.
Its not just about hand to hand combat, but strategy, leadership and
the ability to think fast are very important. Thats my take on it
anyways :)
The question also arose about how we'd treat elite units which
already has a close combat reroll. We decided this would call for
exceptions to the reroll rule, which will be unfair. Also, we dont
like rules with exceptions, as that generally means its not a good
rule (i think i speak for all of us here in sunny Norway on this :)
Rune
>
> Fra: "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/05/10 Fri PM 01:59:25 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls
>
> Hi!
>
> Who said this unit would be elite? Mind you, just because something is
> an HQ doesn't automatically make it elite. As a matter of fact I would
> argue that only non-HQ units that deserve it should be elite
> (Terminators, some or all aspect warriors, etc).
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:52 AM
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls
>
> Hmm...
>
> I look with horror onthe day I finally manage to kill a HQ Slann Mech
> with both a 4+ and a 1+ save, only to see it making the Elite reroll
and
> save at 1+ once more...
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Steve Kerry <steve_kerry_uk_at_...>
> > Dato: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 11:21:17 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls
> >
> > There were a lot of polls, and they came hot on the
> > heels of 100+ messages. I must admit I deleted a lot
> > of the discussion without reading it, because I simply
> > didn't have time to plough through it all.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> > http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri May 10 2002 - 12:46:28 UTC