RE: [NetEpic ML] Diplomacy

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:47:11 -0400

Hi!

Seeing how the opinion is so divided, best leave it as a two tiered
approach. Nobody would get enough votes for a clear majority.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:29 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Diplomacy

Or we could do a poll?

All those in favor of a cost formula developement and those who think
the
prices don't need any changeing????


NIls

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 14. mai 2002 15:27
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Diplomacy


Hi!

This is where the Net Epic coordinator earns his pay.

Costs
Some what change others don't. I could do a vote, but its easy to see it
will be a divided affair with no clear winner.

I will propose, what I did in the original 1.0 rules. That's is, have
two points costs. The ones the way they are and a separate one that is
being developed. Best of both world, I like giving choices after all.

If you got a better idea I'd like to hear it.

Peter




To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 14 2002 - 14:47:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:40 UTC