Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Eldar suggestion

From: Tom Webb <tom.webb_at_...>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 10:28:50 +0100

Either sounds good to me.

Both are a good compromise.





"antichrist666it" <seimejote_at_...> on 21/05/2002 10:28:29

Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com

To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
cc:

Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Eldar suggestion


--- In netepic_at_y..., "Tom Webb" <tom.webb_at_s...> wrote:
> 1100? I am not an Eldar player, but I have played against them and
I have
> never had a problem with the Eldar army as it is (apart from the
free
> cards). My suggestion is up the points of the Wind Rider host by 50
points
> for all craftworlds except Saim Haim and then give a small discount
to the
> other craftworlds for there specialist units and restrictions on
what they
> can take to balance it out.
>
> Tom.

...or make them the same price but with slightly better stats, like
Ulthw� Black Guardians company, for example...



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/








*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.

Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.

If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.

We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.

This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.

Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
Received on Tue May 21 2002 - 09:28:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:41 UTC