RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:31:37 -0400

Hi!

Same with me, although, according to you logic, there should be no
separate PDF either.....

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:46 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Tom Webb [mailto:tom.webb_at_...]
> Sent: 21. May 2002 14:39
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
>
>
> I always played them as allies, so you are allowed up to 25%
> of your points
> allowance.
>
> As per normal with allies, you must purchase a company first,
> and then you
> are allowed support and special cards.
>
> But then I applied this same rule with Titans in a non-tech
> guard army,
> they are allies.
>
>
>

There are many ways of doing things. I still don't regognize the
existance of Tech-guard; to me they're mechanized IG. In my fluff there
is no such thing as independent Adeptus Mechanicus or a machine god...
:)

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is money.


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 21 2002 - 16:31:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:41 UTC