> Besides, I really loathe tha "Machine God" background. Notice that I am not proposing the eradication of Tech Guard from Net Epic. Although the temptation is great, such proposal would have no chance whatsoewver of actually beig accepted.
-------> I really like the "Machine God" background. Not that the machines are actuall dieties, but I like the religious aproch the humans have to technology. It makes the 40K universe more dark, mysterious and gothic.
Eivind
> Fra: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/05/22 Wed AM 08:43:47 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 21. May 2002 19:32
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Same with me, although, according to you logic, there should be no
> > separate PDF either.....
> >
> > Peter
> >
> [snip]
>
> Why? Haven't you read Codex Exercitus? Ahem: "Every Imperial world has a duty to raise and maintain its own planetary defense force." Report for re-education immediately, Commissar Ramos. Thank you for your cooperation, the High Lords are your friends ;)
>
> IMO it is highly illogical that, after the Heresy, there exists an organization outside the administratum which has its own private army AND fleet transport. PDF is no problem since they won't leave their home planet without Imperial Fleet to transport them.
>
> Besides, I really loathe tha "Machine God" background. Notice that I am not proposing the eradication of Tech Guard from Net Epic. Although the temptation is great, such proposal would have no chance whatsoewver of actually beig accepted.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Wed May 22 2002 - 07:54:35 UTC