It is really a question of what your opponent allows you to use.
I refuse to play a "straight" army against a combined army, but I have said to my IG/SM opponent that his IG/SM- force can meet my Squat/SM force any day. So far, they have stayed at the right side of the galaxy...
Eivind
>
> Fra: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:18:46 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Saari Jyrki (NMP/Tampere)
> > Sent: 23. May 2002 14:18
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ext [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > > Sent: 23. May 2002 13:06
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] GW vs Epic questions
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I think so.
> > >
> > > I would not mix knights with regular IG. TG has a different
> > > commandstructure than IG. Finally, I would not mix TG
> > > infantry with regular infantry. If you want mobile IG, bye
> > > supportcards of Chimeras!
> > >
> > > Eivind
> >
> > I have both knights and mechanized companies (normal and
> > assault) for my IG. But like I said, I don't acknowledge the
> > existance of either knights or machine god in my own games.
> >
> Meant to say: _tech guard or machine god_.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 23 2002 - 11:34:12 UTC