Sv: Re: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Marine Revision Part IV

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:17:09 +0200

My thoughts exactly.

I think the rules for BA in the old SM game where pretty good. Before battle, you rolled for each detachment. Ona roll of 1, one stand went into the death company.

But why change the BA at all?

Eivind
>
> Fra: "Tom Webb" <tom.webb_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/05/29 Wed AM 11:08:02 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Marine Revision Part IV
>
> An Ork player?
>
>
>
>
>
> <eivind.borgeteien_at_...> on 29/05/2002 10:06:54
>
> Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> cc:
>
> Subject: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Marine Revision Part IV
>
>
> Hwo wants to use such an army?? They will be too unpredictable.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: "Sam Dale" <epic_at_...>
> > Dato: 2002/05/28 Tue PM 11:18:28 CEST
> > Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Marine Revision Part IV
> >
> > > >Black Rage
> > > >Due to their psychopathic nature, all Blood Angels units are affected
> > > >by the Black Rage. As a result, they have a bonus of +1 CAF when on
> > > >Charge orders, but they have to make a Black Rage check each turn.
> > > >Roll 1d6 for each Blood Angel detachment at the start of the Orders
> > > >phase: on a roll of 1 it MUST be placed on Charge orders.
> >
> > > I would have proposed this too, but its too tedious. Rolling for god
> knows
> > > how many detachments in a 4000 point battle is too slow and annoying.
> >
> > How about rolling just before the unit is activated (firing or moving)
> and
> > if they roll a 1, they go on Charge.
> >
> > Sam.
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************
> This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
> Registration No: 2706218.
>
> Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
> this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
> forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
> intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.
>
> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
> by using the reply facility in your email software.
>
> We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
> the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
>
> This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
> relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
>
> Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
> Middlesex, TW8 9DH
> ******************************************************
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Wed May 29 2002 - 09:17:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:42 UTC