RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [v5.0] Blood Angels

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:48:48 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_mindspring.com]
> Sent: 29. May 2002 17:27
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [v5.0] Blood Angels
>
>
> >What about the detachments with only five stands? Do they
> count as having
> >taken a casualty for break point purposes or are there break
> points lowered
> >by one?
> >
> >Personally I would like to see them count as suffering a loss.
> >
> >Tom Webb
>
> Good question. I'm with you - I think they'd count as having
> suffered a
> casualty. The Death Company is both fearless and unbreakable,
> and making
> the rest of the army (well, the infantry at least) very
> slightly easier to
> break seems right. When you've got a Break Point of 15, three
> extra doesn't
> seem that bad. And given that the Death Company is gonna be
> right there in
> front to absorb a lot of the casualties... I like it.
> -Yar
>
>
>

I like your proposal. Balances the advantages of having an unbreakable killer-company nicely.

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 05:48:48 UTC