:), good answer.
"Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...> on 31/05/2002 15:53:49
Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT
Hi!
I was using both, so as to simulate better cover, if its one or the
other that sucks.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Webb [mailto:tom.webb_at_...]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:48 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT
Question is, do you use your cover save or your armour save?
"Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...> on 31/05/2002 15:48:03
Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT
Hi!
<evil grin> Then you should play epic 40k <ducks in under cover awaiting
the vicious counterassault>
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:39 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT
I see no reason what so ever to differensiate AP vs AT. I have always
percieved it that they have two modes of shooting. AT ammo vs tanks and
such, HE ammo vs personell. This is abstracted in netepic, as it should
be, that the weapons are equall effective vs both type of targets.
Keep It Simple (Stupid) is my slogan... :-)
Eivind
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.
Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained
in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is
prohibited.
If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.
We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network
for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.
Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.
If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.
We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 14:54:16 UTC