[NetEpic ML] Re: Rules Proposition X

From: Weasel Fierce <septimus__at_...>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:19:35 GMT

>From: "Damian Miller" <damianmiller_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Rules Proposition X
>Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:25:06 -0600
>hi, Pete
> after scanning my 1x10'''' emails, i am overcome by the number of
>whiners out there. Infantry dont get a save or need one. if they did
>they would be even more powerful then tanks, or super heavies. The game
>i believe is about how you use and lose your forces. Not if you get a
>chance to save them with dumb luck. As many of us know the Epic system is
>for huge battles and dead units may not be dead, just out of commision.
>to give a save to a unit that doesn't get one completely changes how the
>game works. I play Squats, Marines and Orks, and any one of them would
>love a free saving throw. I mean ca'mon, think( or have nightmares) about
>squat infantry that will rise from the ground after you've gone to the
>trouble of mowing them down. I can see a desire for such a thing, but i
>see it a an unneccessary waste of time. Remember, just because you can do
>something doesn't always mean you should.

well, as it is now, marines, eldar aspects and termies are mown down by

I think this is out of character. While we might not go to 40K lengths I
would like to see infantry with some degree of survival chance

Received on Fri Dec 17 1999 - 07:19:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:49 UTC