What would happen to the detachment then as they would have to stick within
6cm of the now untransported infantry , assuming they survive the
immobilisation/crash?
G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot
> something
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > Sent: 14. June 2002 12:29
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot
> > something
> >
> >
> > As with some other stats and units, I dont think a direct
> > translation is the proper way to go. 40K and Netepic has
> > different rules and scale. I think the proper translation
> > would be to consider the rihno destroyed and removed from the
> > game on a roll of 1.
> >
>
> Destroyed would be good, since I don't think the driver would
> stay inside to fire the Bolters. Especially since he would be
> a Blood Angel.
>
> > Eivind
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
> time and time is money.
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> Will You Find True Love?
> Will You Meet the One?
> Free Love Reading by phone!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/JMSolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 10:30:56 UTC