Hi!
Wouldn't just a summary serve well than have them scattered all over?
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:49 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Proxies file
I wouldn't do that! Leave them as they are!
-----Original Message-----
From: jarreas_at_... [mailto:jarreas@...]
Sent: 11. juli 2002 21:18
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Proxies file
Speaking of proxies - if there's going to be a single, unified list of
substitute models, should I take out all the "models to use for this
unit"
suggestions in the army books? Those are the ones in italics after each
unit
description. It'll make the army books about a page smaller, but I don't
know
how useful those are to folks or the format for the upcoming proxies
file.
-Yar
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Jul 12 2002 - 12:04:13 UTC