You can have my name and address for the list :).
"Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...> on 17/07/2002 00:26:39
Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
cc: (bcc: Tom Webb/UK/INTEGRIS_EU)
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Epic A: should we say someting?
Hi!
It seems pretty split so far, but I got an offer from one of the 40k
forums for 30 names and e-mail addresses. So that tips it heavily in
favor of doing something.
I need to hear from more people though. I'm not sending this with less
than 100 names.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Mr_Beat_Master [mailto:Meistro_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:17 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic A: should we say someting?
I don't think that is such a good idea just to leave them to it. We
left them to it when they were writing epic 40K at look at the bloody
mess they inflicted on us! No, something needs to be said. If epic is
ever to be returned to its former glory then the direction they are
taking leads it into the abyss to be forgotten. The petition is a good
step and the names and emails of every epic member opposed to the
current EA should be listed and sent. Other communities need to be
contacted to do the same. If a full scale mobilisation of the epic
community can be acheieved (And mass emails and protests are to be
sent) then it might be enough to shake GW into choosing a better
direction for epic. I can just see jervis face when he comes to his
machine and has 9 million new emails waiting for him! 8�) Maybe then
he will swallow his pride...
--- In netepic_at_y..., darius spano <dmanspano_at_y...> wrote:
> Hi,
> Personally, I thought the rules were changing for the
> better. E40K is all about firepower and suppressing
> units. I thought Epic A took some of that away and
> made it more realistic because close combat was more
> deadly and it encouraged more CC and validated troop
> stereo-types. I prefer Net Epic to E40k but I thought
> Epic A was improving some of E40K. I haven't seen
> vehicle rules.
> Let Jervis be. He will realize if its a dog or not and
> start from scratch or a different angle. The E40K
> group should be sending the messege to him not us. We
> play our own version of Space Marine and the two games
> are very different. How many of us have played E40K?
> If so, how many times? I have played it about 4-5
> times. The E40K group have played it hundreds of
> times. They are better at giving an opinion in that
> regard. We can offer ours as well but the strength
> behind it is not there. If anything let it play out.
> It may surprise us.
> On second thought, why not send him an encouraging
> email because we do take a lot of ideas for building
> armies and troop types from the Fanatic mag. He is
> also willing to support an epic scale while most games
> released these days are 28mm.
> Rambling & Rambling & More Rambling
> Darius the "undecided"/the "uncommitted"
>
> --- Kelvin Henderson <kx.henderson_at_q...> wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I say that we should send in some sort of response
> > from the group. I
> > haven't been following Epic:A's development too
> > closely, I'll admit, but
> > some of what I have heard I like while other things
> > seem absurd. The best
> > way to get Fanatic's (and hence, Jervis') attention
> > is to draft a letter
> > from the whole group, noting our membership numbers
> > in particular, and send
> > it off.
> >
> > If we really want to have a say in the future of the
> > "official" Epic, then
> > we do need to say SOMETHING.
> >
> > -Kelvin....
> >
> > IMPORTANT. Antidisclaimer. This email is not and
> > cannot, by its nature, be
> > confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass
> > across the public
> > Internet, easily readable by any number of system
> > administrators along the
> > way. If you have received this message by mistake,
> > it would be ridiculous
> > for me to tell you not to read it or copy it to
> > anyone else, because, let's
> > face it, if it's a message revealing confidential
> > information or that could
> > embarrass me intensely, that's precisely what you'll
> > do. Who wouldn't?
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.
Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.
If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.
We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
Received on Mon Jul 22 2002 - 08:02:12 UTC