Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] psy power vs unit in close combat

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:57:44 +0200

I agree on this! It should apply to everyone. But I dont think we should go down that road, and I dont picture the slann an necrons as coldblooded either.

Eivind
>
> Fra: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/09/10 Tue AM 09:47:40 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] psy power vs unit in close combat
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext rune_at_... [mailto:rune@...]
> > Sent: 09 September, 2002 21:04
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] psy power vs unit in close combat
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess this would apply to the Mantis missiles as well?
> > In that case, i would object that it would be very
> > tactical to fire mantis missiles at your troops when they
> > are engaged in CC with the enemy, since all Slann/Necron/Dracon
> > units are immune to the effects. In fact, it would be downright
> > stupid not to!
> >
> > Rune
> [snip]
>
> As would be not firing my tactical detachment with TSM of 0 to the high-CAF enemy infantry/bikes swarming over my Baneblade (save 1+). If we take this road it should apply to EVERY single army. Not just a few of them.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 10 2002 - 08:57:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:47 UTC