Will giving Chimeras to IG units as their default transports not make
them indistinguishable from Tech Guard companies?
--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Use either. It will go in as chimeras, but with the caveat of using
> rhinos if you got them. I still use rhinos for HQ transports, but
its
> okay to have chimeras as the default ones.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_c... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_c...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:00 AM
> To: netepic_at_y...
> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG part 3
>
> We are not in the business of taking things away are we?? I thought
that
> was GWs thing. Chimera is the default transport of IG, but I think
the
> commanders should keep their rihnos.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: <jyrki.saari_at_n...>
> > Dato: 2002/09/10 Tue AM 09:28:43 CEST
> > Til: <netepic_at_y...>
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG part 3
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_c...]
> > > Sent: 09 September, 2002 15:21
> > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG part 3
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The only thing I can remember that may not have been resolved
> > > is whether
> > > chimeras should be the default IG transport.
> > >
> >
> > IMO that goes without saying. The commanders should get a Chimera
> instead of a Rhino.
> >
> > > Also, did Ogyrn's ever get that upgrade that was talked about? I
> think
> > > they should.
> > >
> >
> > As I looked through the mails there seemed to be more support on
> leaving them as they are. However, one more poll is not going to
hurt so
> I'll put it up.
> >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Jyrki Saari
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Sep 11 2002 - 15:06:32 UTC