As long as he is attached to a Land Speeder detachment it is OK by me.
Prices seems OK, but for the superheavvies, you should only be allowed to by a SH for the commissar if he is attached to a SH company, and then it have to be the same kind of SH. Meaning no Baneblade attached to a Shadowsword company.
Eivind
>
> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> Dato: 2002/09/12 Thu PM 02:27:06 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
>
> Agreed!
>
> As for the cost..... hmmm, 50 for a vindicator or Predator a 100 for a Leman
> Russ, Full price for a super heavy...... Free for horse, bike or
> sentinel...... For horse and bike his weapons and caf remain the same as for
> the infantry stand. Sentinel and upwards (How about mounting him in a land
> speeder) he recieves the vehicle weapon, but keeps his CAF. Superheavies, he
> gets the tank stats.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> Sent: 12. september 2002 14:18
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
>
>
> hehe...
> OK by me, but then a cost increas would be in order. How much?
>
> I would also consider this a "full" commander with all the usual benefits. I
> would also there make a limitation and only allow it to be attached to one
> tank-detachment just as the bike and horses.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > Dato: 2002/09/12 Thu PM 01:57:42 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> >
> > I don't like that Idea! He should get his own (black) vehicle!!!! Besides,
> > that would make a difference as for Bikes, Roughriders (and sentinels???)
> He
> > would have his own vehicle/animal.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > Sent: 12. september 2002 13:54
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> >
> >
> > In the case of tanks, I was thinking that he climbed onboard one of the
> > existing vehicles, not bringing along his own.
> >
> > Eivind
> > >
> > > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > > Dato: 2002/09/12 Thu PM 01:43:41 CEST
> > > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > They can already mount on horses, or bikes or in their rhinons. I see no
> > > problems by mounting them in sentinels also for the same prise. There is
> a
> > > catch tough. To be mounted on a horse the commisar must be attached to a
> > > rough rider detachment and he may not command other detachments! If we
> > where
> > > to allow him to change his rhino in for a Leman Russ or something
> similar,
> > I
> > > think there should be some additional cost.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > > Sent: 12. september 2002 13:36
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> > >
> > >
> > > We have a mighty tank-battle comming up (maybe semi-mighty, just 4000
> > > points) and it got me thinking. How about commissars attached to tank
> > > companies, bike companies, rough riders and so on. Wouldnt it be natural
> > > that theese units got the option of riding bikes/horses or catching a
> ride
> > > with one of the tanks?
> > >
> > > I picture the tank being a kind of semi-commander, where it didnt have
> to
> > be
> > > given orders, but must follow all normal rules regarding movement and
> > > firing. The commisar would be limited to only give orders to the
> > detachment
> > > he is catchin a ride. The rules regarding targetting commanders would
> > still
> > > apply and when the tank got shot, the VP for the commissar would be
> > awarded
> > > to the opposing player.
> > >
> > > In the case of bikes and horses, the commisar would just ride a
> bike/horse
> > > in stead of a rhino. All normal commissar-rules would apply. Maybe the
> > > commisar even could ride a sentinel??
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > By the way, does anyone know of some decent proxies for rough riders?
> > >
> > > Eivind
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 12 2002 - 14:33:36 UTC