Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] New alternative model

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:07:07 +0200

We use a ronin-titan as a necron titan. They are quite difficult to assemble and I dont think they are very good proxies for imperial warlords. Nevertheless, they are quite cool!

Eivind
>
> Fra: "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/09/26 Thu PM 01:58:08 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] New alternative model
>
> Hi!
>
> Hmm.... VERY intereting. I think they'd make great titan. The fliers
> would also make excellent proxies. It doesn't matter if they are 10mm or
> 6mm since GW epic scale is hardly consistent.
>
>
> A lot of them look pretty "gothic" and would make real good imperial
> titans. The more "mecha" looking ones make good Slann or even eldar.
>
> Thanks for the tip!
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernasconi Davide [mailto:davide.bernasconi_at_...]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:03 AM
> To: Netepic (E-mail)
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] New alternative model
>
> Hi,
>
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_1.html
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_2.html
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_3.html
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_4.html
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_5.html
> http://www.cellentertainment.se/ronin_war/ronin_war_1024_6.html
>
> Do you need something else ???????
>
> I don't know their scale (ie 6mm o 10mm?) but it seems ok for NetEpic.
> Ronin (titan) are 60mm high
>
> Davide
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 26 2002 - 12:07:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:48 UTC