RE: [NetEpic ML] Chaotic question

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:19:06 -0400

Hi!

I agree with Jar's approach on this. I guess we will standardize it when
we get to those army lists.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:09 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Chaotic question

It's how I intended it 'til now... =)

--- In netepic_at_y..., <jarreas_at_m...> wrote:
> Apparently my post was one of the ones deleted by my email program.
Here's a
> summary, since I'm not in the mood to type it all in again.
>
> As it stands, look at the army card. If it says (for example) "1 HQ
detachment
> and 3 detachments of..." then you've got four separate units to
activate. If
> it says "1 Champion & 10 Minotaurs" then you've got a single
activation (and
> the units have to stay within coherency).
>
> IMHO, armies like Chaos and Orks need to have their leaders nearby.
Armies
> like Marines and Eldar are able to have their leaders go off and do
nifty
> stuff while the troops deal with the enemy. I'll look through the
army card
> lists to make sure this is a little more clear.
> -Yar


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:19:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:48 UTC