I am in total agreement with George here, why should the loyalist marines
have special treatment? We have lists for the loyal chapters, why not the
traitor legions, each legion will only have a couple of unique legions and
then just a different selection of army cards. Otherwise I feel it is just
discrimination against daemon worshipping scum :p.
Speaking of which, I hate to mention it *stands well back from the screen as
he types* but are we going to redo all the army cards?.....
Tom.
----- Original Message -----
From: "george_millett_uk" <Dead_Jester13_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Thoughts on Chaos
> 4. Let's get all the original traitor legions into the book. Last
> > go
> > > around hand some great ideas for legions such as the Iron Hands
> and
> > > Nighthunters. Most of them are associated with a single power,
> so
> > they
> > > can be inserted there, in the appropriate section.
> >
> > The Traitor Legions are nine, the book will be IMHO too huge...
> >
>
>
> Not necessarily as we don't really need that much per legion. Say a
> paragraph or two of background per legion, any special restrictions
> or new costs on existing army cards then any new army cards / rules
> for that legion. It would be a page at the most per legion so 9 extra
> pages. Anything more needed could be done in a "campaign pack"
> detailing the new units, battles of the campaign etc
>
> G
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 19 2002 - 23:42:22 UTC