Yep, I agree... all armies should be in, playtest will clarify things.
--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm not opposed to people making their own armies to simulate
current
> fluff, but remember that that doesn't mean its core. Remember all
the
> gnashing of teeth and stomping regarding the Slann and that one took
> YEARS to straighten out (and we still have detractors on that one).
>
> I think once the timelines gets accepted will have a framework to
which
> to add and design. Of course it doesn't mean we can't make up more
army
> lists, we have some for Ogre, alpha, ratmen and a whole host of
others.
> But like I said above, core, is another beast entirely.
>
> This revision is different from the others because I want to
encourage
> all those new units and rules that in the past got lost in the
dust. But
> remember, just because they are in the book it doesn't mean we can
ram
> them down peoples throats. With very few exceptions, mostly
everything
> we do is optional. Only time and play testing can make something
core.
>
> Peter
Received on Sun Nov 24 2002 - 11:59:22 UTC