Hi!
That pretty much sums up why we need animosity. I wouldn't mind another
simpler alternative, but just restricting choices (as in limiting the
amount of powers fielded) brings the problem of not letting people use
the minis they have in the combinations they are accustomed to. Under
animosity you can use any models; you just have to think on how to work
with animosity.
As Jar said, baring some other solution, animosity seems the only way
out.
Primarch
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:08 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: RE: [NetEpic ML] Some Comments about Chaos 5.0
Fair enough. Perhaps Animosity isn't a solution = but the problems of
limiting Chaos remains. The various Chaos Powers are each strong in an
area and weak in others (Khorne & Close combat, etc). Up until now,
animosity has been used as a deterrent to taking a 4-Power army. What
can we use instead? No more than 2 Powers ever? No more than 1 Greater
Daemon per 1000 points? Unless we get a viable alternative, animosity
will remain.
-Yar
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
|~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
|~ ^
/~ |
You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sun Mar 02 2003 - 18:56:11 UTC