Hi!
Sorry Kevin, for some reason when I saw the idea I read Darius name
(perhaps the comment, not the original post), so I thought he did it.
I humbly prostrate myself before you and beg for forgiveness.
I will now publicly state:
WHAT A GREAT IDEA, I LOVE IT, KEVIN YOU ROCK!
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: darius spano [mailto:dmanspano_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:18 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Gutbuster Weapons: Q's
Hi Kelvin,
I did correct Peter that it was your idea. I think he
meant that he and I liked it a lot.
Darius
--- Kelvin Henderson <kx.henderson_at_...> wrote:
>
> >Well it seems Darius's idea for this rules has won
> critical acclaim!!
>
> Darius's idea? I thought it was mine! Surely
> someone else didn't beat me
> to it?
>
> >I must say, after much, thought, I cannot think of
> any downside to it
> >and it nicely eliminates most of the complaints
> people had with this
> >weapon. The all or nothing aspect of it has been
> successfully
> >neutralized with this rule.
>
> The only downside is Ork players who are used to
> hitting titans and
> scrapping all their shields in one go. They may
> complain about this, but
> in reality this rule is IMHO much more
> representative of how the Ball
> should work.
>
>
> -Kelvin....
>
_____________________________________________________
>
> "Zathras is used to being beast-of-burden. Very sad
> life.
> Probably have very sad death. But at least there is
> symmetry."
>
_____________________________________________________
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:48:24 UTC