Re: [NetEpic ML] Refined Chaos animosity rule

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:35:33 -0000

You should roll for each pair: the other way effectively doubles the
chances the GD run amok. I've reworded the rule accordingly, so it is
now more clear:

Animosity - Roll 1d6 for each pair of Greater Dæmons of opposite
Chaos powers within 50cm at the start of the Orders phase: on 4+ both
Greater Dæmons and all their attached Minion cards must attack each
other in the subsequent turn. All units with a ranged attack must
move at their normal movement rate during the Compulsory Movement
phase towards the hated Greater Dæmon and fire on it or its minions
(opposite player chooses) in the Advance Fire segment. All units
without a ranged attack must instead move at double their normal
movement rate during the Compulsory Movement phase towards the hated
Greater Dæmon and try to get into close combat with it or its minions
(opposite player chooses). The following Chaos powers are opposite to
each other: Khorne hates Slaanesh (and vice-versa), Tzeentch hates
Nurgle (and vice-versa).

Hope it's more clear now! =)
We can also go the other way and test every GD for itself... this
should lead to more animosity for the Chaos player, but may be more
entertaining... I can live with both versions!

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_m...>
wrote:
> I prefer my version, but I agree it needs some work. One question
that should be answered is, "Does each Greater Daemon make a 4+ roll
to attack ever other GD it can see, or does every *pair* of GDs take
one roll?" It makes a difference.
>
> The way I have it, you point to each GD you control and roll for
every other GD that it can see (and is within 50 cm). If any of those
rolls are 4+, it must pick one of the hated targets and attack.
>
> The way you have it, you point to each GD pair and make a single
roll to see if they are both affected.
>
> Which way should it go?
> -Yar
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=
> \~
> |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
> |~ ^
> /~ |
> You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out
there? -->
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=
Received on Sun Apr 13 2003 - 18:35:33 UTC