That should read... I have NO problem to that :D.
Tom Webb
Webmaster of the EPICentre
http://www.netepic.org - Home of Netepic, EPIC:
Armageddon, VOID and Heresy
----- Original Message -----
From: "NetEpic Webmaster" <webmaster_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Refined Chaos animosity rule
> As a Chaos player, I have problem with it, however I would rather it was
> restricted to just units within 10cm of the Greater Daemon joining in.
>
> Tom Webb
> Webmaster of the EPICentre http://www.netepic.org - Home of Netepic, EPIC:
> Armageddon, VOID and Heresy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Refined Chaos animosity rule
>
>
> > No one forces the Chaos player to field opposite powers (Khorne-
> > Slaanesh or Nurgle-Tzeentch). If he chooses to do so in order to gain
> > tactical advantage, he just have to be more careful deploying and
> > manoeuvering his army...
> >
> > I don't see it as a too penalizing rule, after all... even with 50cm
> > and all GD's minions involved.
> >
> > just my 0.02euro
> >
> > --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > > Hmmm...
> > >
> > > The idea of restricting chaos somewhat is a good one, and animosity
> > is a good concept. However, Im afraid this is too restrictive. The
> > way I read this rule is that whenever two greater deamons are within
> > 50 cm and LOS to each other, the chaos player has 50% chance of
> > loosing the battle.
> > >
> > > I think the range should be shortened to 40 cm, and it should not
> > include the minions.
> > >
> > > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:59:47 UTC