Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: My final opinion about chaos! - PART 3 - AntiChrist Codex

From: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:43:01 -0400 (EDT)

>>> No, in 4.1 they are knight!
>>
>> +AC+ in the original WD article they were walkers, I think this
>> differentiation just slip off the 4.1 codex...
>>
>I think is more correct that is a Knight.
>

So do I. They're knights in version 3.0, 4.0 and 4.1, their fluff is that they're the remnants of the Imperial Knights that pledged to Chaos, and they're *called* knights. That's enough for me.
-Yar



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
 |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
 |~ ^
/~ |
         You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Wed Apr 16 2003 - 21:43:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:53 UTC