Re: [NetEpic ML] Digest Number 1216

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:57:05 -0000

What if I charge different detachments with each stand? Or perhaps I
charge a unit with a different pinning size (i.e., 2 ork stands
outnumber a titan?)?

If we introduce a new rule about this (I like very much the EpicA's
assaults), we have to take care of all the possibilities.

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, <jyrki.saari_at_n...> wrote:
> In the original suggestion there was a positive modifier to the
roll if you outnumber the enemy.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Albert Farr� Benet [mailto:cibernyam_at_h...]
> Sent: 19 May, 2003 14:56
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: RE: [NetEpic ML] Digest Number 1216
>
>
> I think this kind of rule may be good for E40k or EA, but not for
NetEpic. My thought is that NetEpic has too many different kind of
units to alter CC system without affecting the whole game behaviour.
A very clear example is that it will be very difficult to find a rule
suitable both for a BIG ork mob (30 models or +) and an Aspect
warrior unit (4 models).
>
> A possibility would be to make a CC withdrawal morale check when a
detachment loses half its power, even if the company card is not
broken. But again we collide with other problems. This works well for
most armies (specially Squats) but not for orks.
>
> Albert
Received on Mon May 19 2003 - 14:57:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:54 UTC