RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Tyranid summary

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:37:10 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_caribe.net]
> Sent: 01 June, 2003 17:33
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Tyranid summary
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I would agree with you, since they have no minds of their own
> and should
> attack "anything" within range.
>

Meaning any enemy units?

> DO people think this is a sufficient disadvantage? Too
> detrimental? Not
> detrimental enough?
>
> Peter
>
[snip]

Sounds good to me, at least without any playtest data. The requirement to attack the CLOSEST target must be stressed clearly enough to prevent loopholing.

Jyrki Saari
Received on Mon Jun 02 2003 - 07:37:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:54 UTC