RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Eldar summary

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:07:07 +0200

It's a matter of practicallity aswell.

We're making the eldar even more frail by making this change!!!

Suggestion!

How about adding an extra warlock to the Wraithguard/Wraithlord
companycard??

Nils

-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: 21. august 2003 09:03
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Eldar summary


--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "ramospeter" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > +AC+ 125?
>
> That is prehaps the happy medium.
>
> > +AC+ Fluffwise only Warlocks, IIRC
>
> Should farseers be added to? They were warlocks too, werent they?

+AC+ To be honest, I don't know (GW backgrounds are really chaotic,
aren't they?)... but IMO they are concerned with far superior matters
other than lead a bunch of undead machines! :P

>
> Peter



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Aug 21 2003 - 07:07:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:56 UTC