I really dont think they should use falcons. It goes to avaiability and general gamebalance. If we allow one stand of WG in a falcon, we break a barrier and should also allow one termie in a rihno.
Eivind
>
> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> Dato: 2003/08/21 Thu AM 09:15:20 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Eldar summary
>
> or just 1 stand per falcon.....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
> Sent: 21. august 2003 09:12
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Eldar summary
>
>
> Maybe only in Wave Serpents (the older models are larger than a Land
> Raider), 2 stand per WS.
>
> --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > Ahaaaa!
> >
> > "This is your wakeup-call" :-)
> >
> > They are based 5 pr stand!! I thought them was based one pr stand
> and where as big as dreadnoughts/robots. Thats for me not paying
> attention! :-)
> >
> > I think they could be classified as infantry for movementpurposes,
> but as long as you cant take termies in rihnos, you shouldnt take
> wraithguards in Falcons. Wraithguards are larger than termies and
> falcons are not significant larger than rihnos.
> >
> > Eivind
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 22 2003 - 09:54:06 UTC