RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)

From: <rune_at_...>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:46:43 +0200

Hey guys!

Just thought i'd pop in and say hi and give my thoughts on this.
I do agree with you that a game should not revolve around a few
units, and to be honest it gets quite boring playing the Slann.
But, you have never played with the Slann, and you don't realize
how difficult it is to play with the mechs when you have so few
other detachments to move. A squat army could easily, and i mean
EASILY annihilate the mechs every time if you just know how to do
it. Both Peter and Nils have told you how, you just havn't done it:)

But, having said that, whatever you guys decide is fine with me, i'm
sure it won't be the last change anyways :)

Rune

> OK
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> What does the rest of you think?
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > Dato: 2003/10/30 Thu AM 11:48:59 CET
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)
> >
> > Tadpole detachment 300
> > > Frog Detachment 400
> > > Bullfrog detachment 500
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > Sent: 30. oktober 2003 11:39
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)
> >
> >
> > My comments on your comments to my comments...
> > >
> > > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > > Dato: 2003/10/30 Thu AM 11:21:40 CET
> > > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)
> > >
> > > See my comments to your comments....
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > > > On neuro disruptor missiles remember that you need to fire 3 missiles
> > > > together (large template) to affect preatorians and titans.
> > >
> > > ------> Hm... This is news to me!
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> I see that I've forgotten to put it in the rules aswell... Well
> > it
> > > is a good rule and should be added.
> >
> > ----> OK
> >
> > > So to make units
> > > > with shields immune, would IMO be an overkill!!!
> > >
> > > -----> OK. Agree.
> > >
> > > > Warpshields up to 5+, yea Im open for that, but this would mean that the
> > > > mechs would go further down in cost (By another 50 - 100 points) meaning
> > > > there would be room for even more Slann units on the board.... I'm not
> > > sure
> > > > that is a good idea......
> > >
> > > -------> Its OK by me :-)
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>> Another point to remember though! The mechs are somewhat slow,
> > yes
> > > they can warp jump, but without a vanguard or magemech to guide them this
> > is
> > > very unpresice.
> >
> > -----> I have never seen them fielded without vanguards or magemechs, and it
> > would be quite stupid to field them without.
> >
> > Also keep in mind that all other armies will have weaponry
> > > that will be able to take out slann from afar, while the mechs themselves
> > > only have short to medium ranged weaponry!
> >
> > ------->The armorsaves are still quite good so this will be a minor nuisance
> > :-)
> >
> > > New cost suggestion:
> > > Tadpole detachment 250 pts (500 for company)
> > > Frog Detachment 350 pts (700 for company)
> > > Bullfrog detachment 450 pts (- the flamer, + another battery of heavy
> > > miniguns)
> >
> > ----> What was the old costs?
> >
> > Eivind
> > >
> > >
> > > Eivind
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sat Nov 01 2003 - 09:46:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:57 UTC