Re: [NetEpic ML] Squat book

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:09:52 -0400

Weasel Fierce wrote:

>>Jar, the stats for heavy bolters should remain as they are.
>>
>>But I would like to pose another question to the group. Net epic uses
>>bolters for anti-personnel weapons, when I think they should be heavy
>>bolters.
>>
>>My question is should everything just remain as "bolters" with the stats
>>the orginally had or should all vehicle mounted "bolters" be upgraded to
>>Heavy bolters to make those weapons more useful?
>>
>>
>>
>
>I'd say just up the range to 25cm to make them less pansy (currently they
>are beaten by guardsmen with laspistols!). Keep the hit number on a 6 is
>fine with me. They snapfire without penalty right ? Or am I dreaming.
>
>Weasel
>
Hi!

Thats my feel too. I'd leave them with a 5+ to hit, snap fire penalty
aplies, but they do get the "free" defensive fire against infantry
charging vehicles with bolters.

Peter
Received on Thu Feb 19 2004 - 02:09:52 UTC