Re: [NetEpic ML] Squat book

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:24:54 -0400

Weasel Fierce wrote:

>>Thats my feel too. I'd leave them with a 5+ to hit, snap fire penalty
>>aplies, but they do get the "free" defensive fire against infantry
>>charging vehicles with bolters.
>>
>>
>
>That would give the same result for snapfire purposes, butit might make
>rhino's and such, too good a deal ?
>
Hi!

After some thought, I think your approach is better. Increase range, 6+
to hit no snap fire penalty.

Peter
Received on Thu Feb 19 2004 - 02:24:54 UTC