Re: [NetEpic ML] Slaan titans

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:40:14 -0800

Hi!

Jarreas Underwood wrote:

>Should the Slaan and Imperator titans go back to the origional armor saves? I just re-read the origional data card and found that the Imperator made armor saves on 2D6. This was never mentioned in any of the earlier NetEpic versions, and I missed it until I read it in the Slaan titan descriptions.
>
Armor saves on 2d6, we never changed it. If the rules aren't clear on it
then make it clear. :-)

>How have people been doing this? Have your Imperator armor saves been made on one or two dice? Do we want to use the origional rules? It makes Imperators, and by extension the Slaan Komodo and Dragonking, extremely tough - the Slaan titans even moreso as they have better shields and better repair rolls. Opinions?
>
The Imperator and their slann equivalents should use the same rules for
2d6 armor rolls.

>Personally, I like the idea of incredibly resiliant Slaan titans - the best technology *should* be notable on the battlefield. I would, however, increase their cost by at least 50%, more like 75% or so.
>-Yar
>
Comparing them to the Imperator at 2250 points, Slann titans should cost
more, but I'm not certain that such a high markup maybe too much. Also
placing titan costs above 3000 points virtually eliminates them from
most tabletops, so some consideration should be given to that.

Peter
Received on Thu Mar 18 2004 - 02:40:14 UTC