>> I think Striking Scorpions and Howling
>> Banshee are too mighty in close combat. +6 is
>> too much. +3 would be more rigth. With a
>> laspistol (25 cm, 5+).
>> Theses Eldar Aspects are not better
>> than imperial assault SM. Theirs special
>> rules are more than enough.
>
> True, this is an old "inconsistency". Problem is
> to change it might cause unforseen balance problems
> in the eldar army. I would test the theory and then
> perhaps submit the results to the group.
>
Thanks.
But I think that the laspistol compensate
the CAF reduction. For exemple in defense with a
Fire Order or against ennemies in higher grounds.
>> IMPERIAL SPACE MARINES
>> [SNIP Rhinos/SM]
>>
>> I think that SM would be able to have
>> better fire skill. Like 4+.
>
> I agree in principal, but since GW burdened us
> with a d6 system a +1 bonus (or penalty) is just
> too much and causes balance issues. This is
> something that has been tried and in my
> experience makes SM too good.
>
Ok. I think you're right.
>
>> In SM2/TL, I concede a +1 bonus against
>> infantery for all anti-personnel weapon like
>> bolter, storm bolter & co... To give infantery
>> back the like, I add a modifier to fire against
>> it equal to TSM.
>
> Not a bad idea. What has been your experience with it?
>
It was good. But I play in urbain ground.
But I don't know effects in lighter grounds.
Archi Magister Feagul
"ANHAK DRAKKHEN AGHNAHIR HURTHD !!!!!"
.
Received on Mon May 31 2004 - 15:44:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:59 UTC