Re: Close Combat discussion

From: Stephane Montabert <kotrin_at_...>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:34:29 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Yar,

Well, the discussion died somehow but I still have a
webpage containing the four proposals made regarding
this would-be rule.

http://www.stephane.info/show.php?code=gang_up

Despite each variant is described in just one or two
sentence, there are very subtle differences and they
should be weighted carefully.

There was no final agreement, but no bawling out as
well! So the topic is still open.

I don't know if such rule should belong to core or
optional. I don't know if you think it's enough to
proceed to vote. It's up to you.

Best regards,

 Stephane

> From: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
> Subject: Close Combat discussion
>
> Looking back, there were quite a few posts on the
> outnumbering rules. Was there a final agreement, or
> did the thread just kinda die out?
> -Yar



=====
Stephane "The Guy Without A Nickname" Montabert
"It's better to enlarge the game than to restrict the players." -- Eric Wujcik


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Received on Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:34:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:59 UTC